In a world that places increasing focus on pattern proprietor payment (intelectual property is a misnomer), there is an inherent problem with a person profitiering off patterns that are essential for life. It wouldn't be so bad if this happened only once, because the person who saves everyone could then be the supreme emperor... witch would probably be bad, but it's simpler to deal with one leader.
We may be faced with folks who want to create the next essential device. These people should become wealthy, because the chance of them coming up with another device to save or enlighten or enslave humanity may be statistically greater.
We should allocate assets to the people who use them best. Unfortuanately, some people are going to be left out. And we can't know apriori who will handle them best.
I saw a movie / some sort of future sports movie, that had a popularity ranking system, as I assume to be it's fundamental currency.
What if we all had a base salary, and voted with our money? We say that NBA super stars should have 10x more resources to spend than we do, and what were CEO's of big corporations may have 10,000X what we have, (granted, what we get paid is the same as our budget... all of ourfunds are intermixed)
So there would be a lot of problems with this model, how do we record the preferences of everybody, so that the weighted average is used.
How do we keep factions from forming that misinform?
Lying must be a crime in and of its self... perjury can happen outside of a court. How do we keep the definition of truth from from being brain washing? We must allow alternate explanations
Pattern Payment and exclusivity should be more like the definition of chocolate, or french cut green beans. MARS and other companies, should put up their exact formulas and procedures for manufacturing for the right to have a trademark/or unique label on that item.
Falsifying manufactured by notes would be punishable.. Basically I should be able to make a snickers bar , with a note, manufactured by Bob Vance... (if my name were Bob Vance, under supervision of Jim Markonebob, equipment by Jeff Moreheadtwiddle certified by **Agency**) and use the word snickers on it!.. maybe even the shape! What I should not be able to do, is say it was manufactured by (whomever makes it for MARS)
If I make a product that isn't what I say it is, **Agency** should be able to shut me down... Royalties to the person who created the recipe for snickers would get royalties through the agency certification fees.
Now if I made it exactly alike, but called it woolie woomba's instead of snickers, people probably shouldn't purchase from off brands, and the agency should recognize that this is snickers, and and lock me up for representing it as something else...
Ok, there are tons of flaws in my thoughts. Why AM I so discontented with our current system? I think it's going to fail.. and I don't want it to. I want to change up to something better .
The Main thing, that I have not seen flaws in, (there probably are tons) is my voting idea... to be posted imediatly after this one as to not mix up this ... unrefined, probably not salvagable idea.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment